• True crime doesn’t have to be exploitative. When done responsibly—focusing on justice, awareness, and respectful storytelling—it can be a force for good. The responsibility ultimately lies with both creators and viewers. Are we consuming this content to learn and advocate, or simply for entertainment? And if it’s the latter, at what cost?

"Hello everyone and welcome to my channel. Today we’re going to discuss the case of…"

If you’ve ever watched true crime content on YouTube, you’re familiar with this kind of opening. A soothing voice, dim lighting, and carefully edited clips follow, unravelling the details of a real-life tragedy.

True crime has become one of the most popular content genres on the internet, with millions tuning in to hear stories of unsolved mysteries, infamous murders, and missing persons cases. But as the genre continues to grow, an ethical question lingers: Is true crime content raising awareness, or is it profiting from real people’s suffering?

On one hand, true crime documentaries and YouTube videos have played a crucial role in keeping cases alive. Content creators like Kendall Rae, who runs the Mile Higher Foundation, have used their platforms to advocate for victims and their families. Her foundation provides financial support to charities and GoFundMe campaigns dedicated to missing individuals, ensuring that the cases are not forgotten. YouTubers like her approach true crime with sensitivity, prioritizing awareness over shock value.

However, not all creators uphold the same ethical standards. Many treat these cases as mere entertainment, focusing on gruesome details to keep viewers engaged. The monetization of tragedy raises concerns—how ethical is it to profit from someone else’s pain? Imagine being a family member of a murder victim, only to find YouTubers dissecting your loved one’s final moments for views, complete with dramatic sound effects and clickbait titles.

Read More

  1. Universities Should Resolve the Missing Marks Crisis
  2. Spirituality Vs Money: What Is The True Measure Of Wealth?
  3. Valuing Independence: More Embrace Childfree Choices

There’s also the issue of accuracy. Some content creators prioritize speed over thorough research, spreading misinformation and speculation that can harm ongoing investigations. The Amanda Knox case, for instance, was plagued by media sensationalism, leading to wrongful accusations and public hysteria. When true crime content strays from fact-based reporting into the realm of conspiracy, it risks causing more harm than good.

That being said, true crime doesn’t have to be exploitative. When done responsibly—focusing on justice, awareness, and respectful storytelling—it can be a force for good. The responsibility ultimately lies with both creators and viewers. Are we consuming this content to learn and advocate, or simply for entertainment? And if it’s the latter, at what cost?

True crime will always be fascinating, but it’s up to us to ensure that the real people behind these stories aren’t forgotten in the pursuit of clicks and views.