• Who will step forward with integrity and boldness to support a nation in dire need of leadership?

The post-election violence that unfolded in 2007 continues to haunt the memories of many individuals who witnessed its devastating impact.

Lives were lost, both young and old, as a result of a flawed electoral process characterized by a lack of transparency, credibility, legitimacy, and accountability.

In each subsequent election cycle, the spectre of claimant looms large as those dissatisfied with the electoral outcomes seek to challenge the results. The judiciary becomes the battleground for exercising democratic rights and resolving disputes.

The nullification of the presidential result during that historical period is a significant example. However, the absence of penalties for election irregularities only perpetuated the cycle of mistrust and failed to address the root causes.

Efforts were made to address the flaws in the electoral system, with the suggestion of establishing a new bench to replace the existing board.

Read More

  1. Senator Ojienda Criticizes Recall of Justice Mugambi's Security
  2. Putin Calls for Workplace Intimacy to Boost Birth Rates
  3. Former Nakuru Assembly Majority Leader Reinstatement Sparks UDA Backlash

Unfortunately, this change did little to rectify the issues, as allegations of fraud and lack of legitimacy marred the subsequent 2022 election.

The question arises: who will step forward with integrity and boldness to support a nation in dire need of leadership?

The Mlolongo system, with its simplistic approach of lining up and counting those with the majority, seemed like an easy solution. However, it was riddled with corruption and crime.

It forced citizens to expend their hard-earned money in vain, only to witness the repercussions of a flawed process. Finding an alternative system that upholds the principles of fairness, accountability, and secrecy is imperative.

In today's world, media houses hold significant sway over public opinion and shape the narrative surrounding elections. Leveraging this influence, the independent judiciary should provide official dates for media houses to produce results based on public sentiment.

Each media house could dedicate a day for citizens to voice their opinions on television or through written submissions, enabling the democratic process to be guided by the voices of the people.